Management has evolved immensely over recent decades in response to the changing business environment. New approaches to management and new management theories have emerged. Managers are also better educated and trained with more colleges offering business education and there has also been greater use of computer based training. Learning for management and staff is now viewed as ongoing. Management has made the structure of modern industry possible. It is management’s task to manage systems and make the best use of resources. Ultimately, management’s main responsibility is to undertake to achieve the organisation’s goals.
What is a manager?
Management and Leadership
Management is often confused
with leadership. In simple terms leadership is ‘getting others to follow’
or ‘getting others to do things willingly’. Leadership is related to motivation
and to the process of communication. Management and leadership are sometimes
seen as synonymous, but it does not follow that every leader is a manager
or that every manager is a leader. Management is often viewed as getting
things done through other people in order to achieve stated organisational
goals. However, management is regarded as relating to people working through
a structured organisation and with prescribed formal roles. The emphasis
of leadership is on interpersonal behaviour. Leadership can be seen primarily
as an inspirational process. In their relationships with other people,
managers tend to maintain a low level of emotional involvement. Leaders
create excitement in work and develop images that excite people. Managers
are concerned with stability and order. Leaders are concerned with seeking
opportunities for change. A leader is also a role model who leads by example.
He/She must have a clear vision and be able to communicate this to one’s
own subordinates. For ongoing success the leader must ensure that subordinates
are equipped with the necessary resources to pursue the stated objectives.
Leadership Types
Autocratic:
With this style, the leader
is always the decision maker with power residing with him/her. Communications
is in one direction with little if any opportunity allowed for feedback.
An autocrat is often perceived as a hard task master but may also have
a caring or paternalistic approach. Under this style the leader knows best.
There is little or no consultation with subordinates as managers use fear
and threats as management tools. The leader/manager makes all major decisions
with orders being issued and it is expected that they will be followed
without question. This method can work well in the short run, but may give
rise to resentment and a lack of goodwill. No other person gets any experience
in decision making. Difficulties could emerge should the need occur to
replace the autocratic manager.
Democratic:
Under this style, subordinates
are consulted by the leader in setting objectives, devising strategies
and in the allocation of tasks. Power is shared with subordinates with
the leader being the ultimate arbiter. The delegater encourages subordinates
to contribute to decision making. Peoples’ feelings and emotions are respected
with shared solutions being sought. The job satisfaction of subordinates
usually improves. It may not always suit when trying to implement change
or where immediate decisions are required. This method of decision making
is more time consuming than autocratic, and decisions may be no better.
Opportunities could be lost due to delays.
Laissez Faire:
The subordinates are given
free rein under this style of leadership. Very little direction or discipline
is exercised by the leader.
Responsibility is very
much in the employee’s hands. With this style the leader allows subordinates
to make decisions with little or no intervention by him/her. Subordinates
are given no boundaries to work within. It could be feasible where employees
are self motivated and work a lot on their own initiative i.e. researchers.
Mission Statements
This involves laying down
the direction in which the firm is heading in the long term. It sets down
the objectives the firm is pursuing so that the firm is clear about where
it is heading and why it is heading that way. It is important that this
mission is communicated properly to workers. In some organisations mission
statements are placed in visible positions for all to see.
Directing
This is concerned with
deciding the direction in which the organisation is going. Direction requires
good motivation and communication.
Good direction results
when:
Motivation
Motivation is defined as
the processes or factors that cause people to act or behave in a certain
way. It refers to those factors that create a need or drive in us to carry
out particular tasks or to behave in a certain fashion. It may also be
viewed as what pushes us to work hard to achieve certain goals. It is always
easy to pursue something we are interested in such as sport, but more difficult
to do something we do not like such as study. Motivation is a psychological
concept related to the direction and strengths of an individual’s behaviour.
Maslow’s Theory
Maslow said that within
every human being there was a hierarchy of five needs. His theory of motivation
is regarded as a major contribution to the human relations approach to
management. The theory is concerned with worker motivation and seeks to
explain how workers can be motivated to achieve higher levels of performance.
The theory is structured
around a hierarchy of needs that can be presented in a pyramid format.
These needs are comprised of:
McGregor’s Theory
Under the theory he outlined
two alternative sets of assumptions concerning human nature that a manager
might pursue, one negative and one positive.
Theory X
1. Employees are
lazy and will do as little as possible.
2. Most employees dislike
responsibility and prefer direction.
3. Employees want only
security and material reward.
Theory Y
1. Employees like work
and want to be challenged.
2. People are motivated
by needs for respect, esteem, recognition and self-fulfilment.
3. People at work want
responsibility with the majority of workers being creative and imaginative.
In summary, theory X is associated with autocratic management approaches while theory Y is associated with democratic management approaches.